Otherwise, it is pointless to be paying the $30 and checking off places to be found in search - in results that are 100, not 5000. So something has made the $30 ads cease to have meaning, and it needs to be fixed. Let's hope this isn't a "feature" and is in fact recognizable as a "bug". And it would be especially important to leave it in if for some reason someone has the "bright idea" to link search/places searches to those categories - when in fact they should only turn up $30 ads.Īnd now we get what is more like the list expected, 148 entries, although not what was previously listed, i.e. For some reason "rentals" isn't even showing in the list, which is odd, because it's still an option you can select to label your parcel inworld.
So let's try taking categories off "All" and see what we get. And that's as it should be, because it was not connected historically, and should not be connected as it only adds confusion to the search process. That is, as I can see from looking at it, not only many of my parcels not even checked off for the $30 search ad, but other people's rentals, as can be expected when you look with categories at "all".īut normally categories are UNRELATED to the search/places search which turns up *what you have paid for only, from the list of $30 ads*. Now, when I type "Ravenglass Rentals" into "search/places" I get 4,420 results. Normally, this number will be between 100-150, depending on how many I checked off by Tuesday, when it debits on group land as a group expense, called a "liability". The $30 search/places ad is merely to show up in a search with a term on search/places. This is a different function than "classifieds," where I could pay $100 or $10,000 depending on how high I want the visibility to be. Normally, when I type in "Ravenglass Rentals" into search/places, I get a list of all those parcels that I have checked off to pay the $30 weekly fee to be viewable in the search/places function. Note that this is on the standard Second Life viewer So this is very important, regardless of whether the forums regs who don't go inworld don't think it is.
0 kommentar(er)
